If money was no object and you wanted something to last a min of 10-15 yrs what would be the minimum spec of the structure and what would you absolutely avoid
![scratch :scratch:](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif)
A-Z CONTENTS | DISCLAIMER | DIY VIDEO | HOME | SAFETY FIRST | FORUM RULES
Moderator: Moderators
me too /im a granite freak ...all tops scratch ..fact of life ..its a case of managing it and compromising between what you want and what you re happy to live with .....imagine an estate agents brochure ? solid surface dos nt quite have the cache of "granite tops"....no. 2 choice would be maia ...which is basically an aliuminium veneer ......beware of products such as earthstone that claim to be the same /they are not even close .diyguys wrote:I would go for granite but its expensive.
Hi have read all answers I personally have fitted howdens, magnet and b and q kitchens and out of those 3 would prefer magnet although offer is pretty limited in styles and b and q do offer a much larger choice but if money was no object have a look at manhatten kitchen range. hope this helps and does not add to confusionskiking wrote:When looking at kitchen units what makes some better than others. Is it the thickness of the carcass or the material the carcass is made out of i.e mdf, chipboard or solid wood.
If money was no object and you wanted something to last a min of 10-15 yrs what would be the minimum spec of the structure and what would you absolutely avoid