Just installed the zone alarm update. My pc now takes about 3 minutes after boot up for the desktop icons to appear on the wall paper (win xp)
Has anyone here had the same problem?
I am considering getting rid of zone alarm, what would you recommend as an alternative?
Zone alarm update, PITA
Moderator: Moderators
- Someone-Else
- Senior Member
- Posts: 14628
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:03 pm
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 2575 times
Zone alarm update, PITA
Above are my opinions Below is my signature.
Would you hit a nail with a shoe because you don't have a hammer? of course not, then why work on anything electrical without a means of testing Click Here to buy a "tester" just because it works, does NOT mean it is safe.
If gloom had a voice, it would be me.
Click Here for a video how to add/change pictures
Inept people use the QUOTE BUTTON instead of the QUICK REPLY section
Would you hit a nail with a shoe because you don't have a hammer? of course not, then why work on anything electrical without a means of testing Click Here to buy a "tester" just because it works, does NOT mean it is safe.
If gloom had a voice, it would be me.
Click Here for a video how to add/change pictures
Inept people use the QUOTE BUTTON instead of the QUICK REPLY section
- ayjay
- Senior Member
- Posts: 9891
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:51 pm
- Has thanked: 458 times
- Been thanked: 1708 times
Re: Zone alarm Alternative
I used Zone Alarm for a long time, but a couple of years back one if the updates caused many problems - I ditched it and have since been using Avast, (I'm also running Win XP -(SP3).
http://www.avast.com/en-gb/index
http://www.avast.com/en-gb/index
One day it will all be firewood.
- Someone-Else
- Senior Member
- Posts: 14628
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:03 pm
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 2575 times
Re: Zone alarm update, PITA
Thanks. But i also need a fire wall, avast is an antivirus, any more suggestions?
Above are my opinions Below is my signature.
Would you hit a nail with a shoe because you don't have a hammer? of course not, then why work on anything electrical without a means of testing Click Here to buy a "tester" just because it works, does NOT mean it is safe.
If gloom had a voice, it would be me.
Click Here for a video how to add/change pictures
Inept people use the QUOTE BUTTON instead of the QUICK REPLY section
Would you hit a nail with a shoe because you don't have a hammer? of course not, then why work on anything electrical without a means of testing Click Here to buy a "tester" just because it works, does NOT mean it is safe.
If gloom had a voice, it would be me.
Click Here for a video how to add/change pictures
Inept people use the QUOTE BUTTON instead of the QUICK REPLY section
- FFX
- Senior Member
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:38 pm
- Location: Folkestone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Zone alarm update, PITA
If its just a firewall, then I would give the free Commodo fire wall a try. I used to use it and never had any problems.
Alternatively, you could of course just use the Windows firewall which is a lot better than most people seem to give it credit for.
Regards
Ian
Alternatively, you could of course just use the Windows firewall which is a lot better than most people seem to give it credit for.
Regards
Ian
- BillyGoat
- Troll Headbutter
- Posts: 8071
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:20 pm
- Location: On top of a mountain, in the long grass.
- Has thanked: 386 times
- Been thanked: 796 times
Re: Zone alarm update, PITA
Are you after outbound protection or just a firewall in general? What are you wanting, feature wise?
I've not bothered in a long, long time other than what's provided by Windows.
A lot of people forget about the protection offered by a router (which 99% of broadband connections have, I'm sure). NAT in itself offers a level of inbound protection against day to day threats/scans/etc. You are not exposed directly like the days of dial-up and a public IP. If it's not 'requested' traffic, then there is no route for it to take - it's simply dropped at the perimeter.
In fact, some routers actually offer in/out bound firewalls too in addition to NAT (I'm not talking a shitty tick box SPI firewall) - I've got one here that does that.
It all boils down to what you want it for, I guess.
BG
I've not bothered in a long, long time other than what's provided by Windows.
A lot of people forget about the protection offered by a router (which 99% of broadband connections have, I'm sure). NAT in itself offers a level of inbound protection against day to day threats/scans/etc. You are not exposed directly like the days of dial-up and a public IP. If it's not 'requested' traffic, then there is no route for it to take - it's simply dropped at the perimeter.
In fact, some routers actually offer in/out bound firewalls too in addition to NAT (I'm not talking a shitty tick box SPI firewall) - I've got one here that does that.
It all boils down to what you want it for, I guess.
BG
Arguing with a woman is like reading a Software Licence Agreement.
In the end, you ignore everything and click "I agree".
In the end, you ignore everything and click "I agree".