Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Painting and decorating, plaster mouldings, Artexing questions

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Shalebing
Newly registered Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:09 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 0

Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by Shalebing »

I am replacing some of the T&G cladding on my timber garage but I wasn't able to obtain treated timber. I intend to give it a couple of coats of Cuprinol Ducksback treatment but should I also give it some sort of undercoat first and if so what would you suggest?
OchAye
Senior Member
Posts: 4806
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:33 pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland.
Has thanked: 855 times
Been thanked: 994 times

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by OchAye »

No undercoat. There are some clear treatments at least cuprinol?, ronseal, and sadolin make them but I don't know if they are meant to be used as a first coat or when there is a problem (woodworm or dry rot).

See what ducks back recommends for new planed wood.
User avatar
ayjay
Senior Member
Posts: 9891
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 458 times
Been thanked: 1708 times

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by ayjay »

OchAye wrote:
See what ducks back recommends for new planed wood.
........and check that it can be over-painted - a quick look at the blurb says "Wax enriched water repellent"
One day it will all be firewood.
OchAye
Senior Member
Posts: 4806
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:33 pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland.
Has thanked: 855 times
Been thanked: 994 times

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by OchAye »

ayjay wrote:
OchAye wrote:See what ducks back recommends for new planed wood.
........and check that it can be over-painted - a quick look at the blurb says "Wax enriched water repellent"
Once it weathers properly 3+ years? it could be painted but then it flakes, so you get tied into using more of the same or trying to scrape it off . I notice my stock of cuprinol - which was meant to be just penetrating - has gone the same way. Corners of some new treated wood I had used it on are losing a crust of the stuff :-(
Shalebing
Newly registered Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:09 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 0

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by Shalebing »

Thanks for the responses guys. I'll double check what the Cuprinol says on the tin but I'd imagine no undercoat is needed.
Shalebing
Newly registered Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:09 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 0

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by Shalebing »

Now that's interesting. Just checked on the can and this is the advice for bare wood. Now what would you class as an "appropriate wood preserver"? :dunno:
Attachments
Img_8074a.jpg
Img_8074a.jpg (536.76 KiB) Viewed 2931 times
ian gibson
Senior Member
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:38 pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 122 times

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by ian gibson »

There's plenty of different wood preservers available in decorators outlets, Blackfriars do a decent one and Sadolin do too. Important to remember to leave the wood preserver for 48 hours before over coating.
These users thanked the author ian gibson for the post:
Shalebing
Rating: 7.14%
OchAye
Senior Member
Posts: 4806
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:33 pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland.
Has thanked: 855 times
Been thanked: 994 times

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by OchAye »

You are caught in the bullshit marketing of Akzo Nobel (which owns dulux, ronseal, cuprinol and others).

As I mentioned above there are wood treatments (preservers) as Ian mentioned too. Cuprinol makes them too, here is one and they have another one somewhere, here is their full list of the cuprinol products.

And a Sadolin preserver.

Ideally you want a combined preserver protector and ducksback is not it. I doubt though the rest of the garage has had the full treatment in its past life.

===========================

BTW. They are not undercoats, undercoat is something that is used to help the top coat stick
These users thanked the author OchAye for the post:
Shalebing
Rating: 7.14%
OchAye
Senior Member
Posts: 4806
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:33 pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland.
Has thanked: 855 times
Been thanked: 994 times

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by OchAye »

PS. Sorry if I sound p*****d off with Cuprinol. I was using it for years, it was good, but the last lot I bought which I am using now is more like pointless paint.
Shalebing
Newly registered Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:09 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 0

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by Shalebing »

OchAye wrote:
Ideally you want a combined preserver protector and ducksback is not it. I doubt though the rest of the garage has had the full treatment in its past life.
Thanks for the info. The rest of the garage has been painted using Ducksback for quite a few years but it was treated timber to begin with. As mentioned this replacement shiplap is untreated which led me to raise the query.
OchAye
Senior Member
Posts: 4806
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:33 pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland.
Has thanked: 855 times
Been thanked: 994 times

Re: Untreated exterior timber - undercoat required?

Post by OchAye »

I would just use Ducksback as you got it.
Post Reply

Return to “Painting & Decorating Forum”